Why I Cut Back My Bets on Heavy Tracks

Recorded September 2025 for Why You’re Losing on the Punt (Even When You Pick Winners). Any figures mentioned are from that time.

Track condition is one of the areas I have put real work into lately. We have seen a lot of heavy tracks, and there are three situations where I have cut back the number of bets I have: heavy 10 surfaces, tracks where the inside is off, and tracks where the rail is out a long way. I am not walking away from them completely. I am trying to understand why they have been harder for me, so I can bet them better rather than just skip them.

The three conditions I pull back on

I have said before that I do not really like betting on a heavy 10. The same goes for a track where the inside is off and for a track with the rail out a long way. Those three things change the race more than people give them credit for. They change where the good ground is, they change where horses want to be, and they change which runners get the easy run. If my usual way of reading a race does not account for that, I am going to be off.

So the first step was simple. Fewer bets on those surfaces. On heavy 10s in particular I have only had a small number of bets, and that is deliberate. If I am not confident in how I read the track, I would rather have fewer bets on it than force them.

Why I look for the reason instead of just avoiding it

It would be easy to say I cannot win on those tracks and leave it there. That is not much of an answer. I want to know why I am not winning on them. So I go back in and look, and I try to figure it out.

The part I keep coming back to on tracks where the inside is off is where the horse settles. On those days I am better off finding horses that will settle midfield, especially in higher pressure races, rather than backing leaders. The leader gets stuck on the worst part of the track and has to do it the hard way. A horse that settles midfield can come off the fence and get onto the better ground when it matters. That is the kind of adjustment I am looking for, rather than a blanket rule to stay away.

Heavy tracks cop more blame than they deserve

When I run my own bets together across heavy tracks, they are not hurting me. They hold up fine against good tracks. Nothing much to report either way, which is the point.

Punters blame heavy tracks for a lot of things that are really their own doing. You back one, it gets beaten, and the heavy track is the reason. Sometimes that is true. A lot of the time it is not. It was the way the race was run, or the spot the horse got, or the bet itself. If you blame the surface every time, you never go back and look at the real cause, and you keep making the same mistake.

If you are going to use this, be honest about which part of the track condition is actually costing you, and then work out what to change. For me that has meant fewer bets on heavy 10s and a different way of picking horses when the inside is off. Your answer might be different, but you only get to it by looking.

Every race on the card, rated, with Kingsley's selections and the speed maps behind them. Your first day is free, no card needed.

More from Kingsley

• Why the Barrier Draw Can Flip a Previous Result
• Why Barrier Three Can Be a Trap at Caulfield
• How Barriers Decide Whether a Race Is Run Fast or Slow

From the full video: Why You’re Losing on the Punt (Even When You Pick Winners)

Gamble responsibly. 18+. If gambling is a problem for you, call Gambling Help on 1800 858 858 or visit gamblinghelponline.org.au