"Should You Back a Horse That Got All the Favours Last Start?"

Recorded September 2025 for 🔥 Moir Stakes MELTDOWN? The Speed Map Puzzle That Could Blow the Race Wide Open!. Any figures mentioned are from that time.

A horse that got every favour last start is normally a horse I want to be against. The run of the race flattered it, the form line is softer than it looks, and the market usually hasn't caught up. But there is one exception I make, and it is simple. If I can see the same scenario setting up again, the favours are not a one-off. They are part of the map. That is how I came to be on Private Eye, and it is the same thinking that had me on Pericles in the same race.

Why favours usually put me off

When a horse wins because it got the right run, the tempo, the trail and the split, you are really backing the race shape, not the horse. Change the shape and the win disappears. So most of the time I will take the horse on next start, because the conditions that created the result are gone.

The question I ask is whether those conditions are actually gone. With Private Eye, I could see a similar scenario panning out again. Maybe not to the same degree, but close enough. Once I think that, the favours stop being a negative. On top of that, second up is no issue for the horse, it ran good time, it came home in good figures, it loves the 1400, and it is really consistent at this level. It is a classy horse and it ticks a lot of boxes. Not one to go crazy on, but one I am happy to back.

Wide draws on on-pace horses

Pericles is the other one in that race for me. The move to Bjorn Baker is a positive, because Baker can definitely improve the horse. Fifth in the Doncaster was a great run sitting on pace, and this is an easier race coming back from that. He ran second in a recent trial on a heavy track. I didn't love the trial, but he still ran second. Josh Parr is riding well and gets on.

The wide alley doesn't worry me. With an on-pace horse and a rider who wants to use it, he should be able to cross and take up a position. That is the point. A wide draw on a horse that wants to be back is a problem. A wide draw on a horse that wants to be forward is often just a bit of early work. Not many people were tipping Pericles or even mentioning him.

Backing horses that land in the right spot

What links the two is position. They are both going to be on pace. They are both going to be in the right spot, stalking. It is the same thinking I used the week before with Treasure the Moment and another one down in the Menzies. I like backing horses where I think they will land in the right spot, and where I expect that same spot to be the winning spot again.

So the next time a horse gets all the favours and wins, don't dismiss it automatically. Work out whether the race is likely to be run the same way again. If it is, the favours are not a warning. They are a map of where the race will be won.

Every race on the card, rated, with Kingsley's selections and the speed maps behind them. Your first day is free, no card needed.

More from Kingsley

• Why On-Pace Imports Struggle in Australian Races
• Why Sprint Races Are Their Own Beast
• How I Decide Whether to Accept the Risk of Getting Trapped Wide

From the full video: 🔥 Moir Stakes MELTDOWN? The Speed Map Puzzle That Could Blow the Race Wide Open! | Max Bet Ep 6

Gamble responsibly. 18+. If gambling is a problem for you, call Gambling Help on 1800 858 858 or visit gamblinghelponline.org.au